Immigration is a social, demographic, economic, and societal challenge in both poor and developed countries, including France.
Politicians should approach this issue based on complex and diverse realities, instead of perceiving immigration through the citizens' perspective.
The debate on immigration in France, based on the exceptional situation of Mayotte, is absurd and constitutes political manipulation.
The bill altering the right of soil in Mayotte distributed by the right and far right did not significantly impact immigration in the area.
Mayotte's conflict is a result of various geographical, geopolitical, and social factors and cannot be resolved merely through legal and immigration measures.
The broader public debate on belonging to the national community falls into the trap of confusing immigration policy with 'national identity'.
Conclusion: There is a risk of leading to the unacceptable dismantling of the right of soil, a principle which since 1889, is based on the republican system of integration through birth, a certain length of stay, and the schooling of foreigner's children.